Cipollone and Philbin appear again before a grand jury following Trump’s unsuccessful effort to invoke executive privilege, media outlets report.

Source: https://triblive.com/news/world/from-election-night-to-indictment-a-timeline-of-the-case-against-trump/

Federal Judge says executive privilege does not apply for the former vice president and he must tell what Trump did or said.

Source: https://capitolhillblue.com/node/94104

In any case, executive privilege would only cover some things and not others.

Source: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/02/ivanka-trump-jared-kushner-special-counsel-subpoena.html?via=rss

Many fought their summons in court — notably, Graham’s challenge went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court — and others pleaded the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination or attorney-client or executive privilege.

Source: https://www.centralmaine.com/2023/01/09/georgia-special-grand-jury-completes-trump-investigation/

Their appearances come after a judge rules against attorneys for Trump who had argued that testimony by Trump's former top White House aides was protected by executive privilege.

Source: https://abc13.com/donald-trump-jan-6-investigation-timeline-indicted-indictment/13582849/

Trump had argued that the logs were subject to executive privilege, but Remus called that assertion “not justified” in her February 2022 letter.

Source: https://www.pressherald.com/2023/01/06/social-security-numbers-of-trump-officials-allies-posted-in-jan-6-files/

Trump's lawyers argued against the subpoenas, saying that executive privilege protected Trump's right to keep his communications during his time as president private.

Source: https://www.rawstory.com/kevin-mccarthy-trump-2659651226/

United States v. Nixon, the court ruled that Nixon, then still in office, had to comply with a trial subpoena seeking tapes of his conversations in the Oval Office, rejecting his claims of executive privilege.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/22/us/politics/trump-supreme-court-immunity.html